City of Racine - File #: 06-2601

• File #: 06-2601
• Version: A
• Name: Oversight that occurred when a portion of Mead Street was renamed South Marquette Street.
• Type: Communication
• Status: Committee Report To Council
• File created: 10/2/2006
• In control: City Plan Commission
• Final action: 1/16/2007
• Title: Subject: Communication from the Commissioner of Public Works/City Engineer wishing to discuss an oversight that occurred when a portion of Mead Street was renamed South Marquette Street. Recommendation: The street currently referred to as Mead Street, which extends from the south line of 9th Street to the west line of Washington Avenue, be renamed South Marquette Street. Fiscal Note: Not applicable. Recommendation of City Plan Commission on 01-10-07: That the street currently referred to as Mead Street, which extends from the south line of 9th Street to the west line of Washington Avenue be renamed South Marquette Street. Further, that the renaming is not in conflict with existing city plans and programs. Fiscal Note: N/A
• Related files: Res.07-0019

Date	Ver.	Action By	Action	Result
1/16/2007	A	Common Council	Approved as Presented	Pass
1/10/2007	A	City Plan Commission	Recommended For Approval	Pass
11/8/2006	A	Common Council	Referred
10/31/2006	A	Public Works and Services Committee	Recommended For Approval
10/17/2006	A	Common Council	Referred

Title

Subject: Communication from the Commissioner of Public Works/City Engineer wishing to discuss an oversight that occurred when a portion of Mead Street was renamed South Marquette Street.

Recommendation: The street currently referred to as Mead Street, which extends from the south line of 9^th Street to the west line of Washington Avenue, be renamed South Marquette Street.

Fiscal Note: Not applicable.

Recommendation of City Plan Commission on 01-10-07: That the street currently referred to as Mead Street, which extends from the south line of 9^th Street to the west line of Washington Avenue be renamed South Marquette Street.

Further, that the renaming is not in conflict with existing city plans and programs.

Fiscal Note: N/A